What has gone wrong with Williams teams efforts and what should be Case Study

What has gone wrong with Williams team ups efforts and what should be done to ensure a successful outcome for the team - Case Study ExampleThe group dynamic theory highlights on the social and psychological problems that come up in workplaces. Members of the team have differences in their opinions on the way forward. Tom is one of the longest serving employees in the organization and has earned more respect from William. Other members of the team include Bryce, Casey, and Jenny. They do not feel loyalty for the organizations they work for (Barr and Gassenheimer 2005, p.82)The major setback among the team leaders is that they lack a common understanding. Designing team assignments and creating environments that support and promote these skills are critical for learning, (Barr and Gassenheimer, 2005, p. 82) Tom get ups most of the decisions hence denying other members of the chance to express their views. According to the group dynamic theory, all team members should be offered an satisfactory opportunity to present their ideas. On the contrary, Tom is incurn to make most of the contributions whereas he is not the group leader. Another problem is the lack of interest. Bryces objective is to see the work done. He does not care where the ideas on the new renovations will be put in place. Jenny, on the other hand, has also been issued with another show that has led to her change in focus.The group dynamic theory has stipulated various solutions to group problems. Firstly, the levels of personal and teamwork communications should be advanced. All communication within groups is between individuals and is, therefore, interpersonal communication (David and Frank 2000, p.145). Relay of information among the group members will help them improve their skills. All employees should contribute opinions while the group leaders should make rational decisions. The group predominates over the individuals and members are expected to accommodate to the demands of the group (H ill, James, Danny, & Mark, 2007, p.71). Toms hard work has made the other team members to wait on