Mis Answers to Cases Essay

MSU-Iligan establish of TechnologyCollege of Business Administration and AccountancySchool of Graduate StudiesMASTER IN BUSINESS forethought PROGRAMIligan CityREAL WORLD CASE 1Toyota Europe, Campbell Soup Company,Sony Pictures, and W.W. Grainger. Making the slick for endeavour ArchitectsToyota Europe, Campbell Soup Company,Sony Pictures, and W.W. Grainger. Making the Case for opening ArchitectsSubmitted toProfessor Adrian Galido, PhDSubmitted bySandee Angeli M. VillartaSeptember 4, 2013Toyota Europe, Campbell Soup Company,Sony Pictures, and W.W. Grainger. Making the Case forEnterprise ArchitectsToyota Europe, Campbell Soup Company,Sony Pictures, and W.W. Grainger. Making the Case forEnterprise ArchitectsREAL WORLD CASE 1-1. What does the opinion of endeavour room decorator entail? What qualifications or experiences would you return a good effort fashion designer should produce? Support your answer with examples from the case.An attempt architect position involves knowing th e current applied science in the first step in respect of its usage efficiency both in material cost and output resolving powering in good productivity and finally huge gains, or whether the engine room in use is still warring or on its stage of fall much(prenominal) that when the technology is about to become obsolete or has outlived its usefulness to the go-ahead, the opening move architect has to tell it all to the top management and of course the new technology to be adopted in lieu of the old one. This is because among the job of the enterprise architect is to map, define/redefine, touch data, standardize technology and rail line litigatees and to translate these into an architectural approach (macro view) to make the art work as a whole, but able to work in private projects within the macro, non still at present but also in the future.Experience gained from IT, overhaul, Distributors of Heavy Equipment, merchandising and Service companies ar preferred. Courses such Engineering, IT, Business and Marketing and from Masteral Courses in Business Management atomic number 18 favored though other courses whitethorn also produce better enterprise architects.The case of Toyota Europe shows a good example that its enterprise architect was able to make its enterprise strategy worked in the present environment and successfully carried it into the contemplated future. That is why its Chief Architect Mr. Heinchkein was able to give a good account of what the job of the enterprise architect should be for that is exactly what he had gaine to Toyota Europe.The experience of Campbell Soup Corp. when it implemented the concept of enterprise architect found it very useful from its description that the enterprise architects work sees to it the best is served for the enterprise as a whole against the individual department and individual projects for things be being centralized and thusly harmonized with optimum efficiency as part of its architectural appro ach.Enterprise architecture (EA) is a contest term that refers to the architecture of an enterprisean organized complex of people and technologiesand the activity of describing or designing enterprises.Enterprise IT Architecting. According to this category, the purpose of EA is the greater alignment between IT and Business concerns. The main purpose of EA is to guide the process of planning and design the IT/IS capabilities of an enterprise in order to meet desired organizational objectives. Typically, architecture proposals and decisions argon limited to the IT/IS aspects of the enterprise other aspects only serve as inputs.Goal Create unityQualifications* rivet on four crucial Cs connection, collaboration, communication, and customers. * UNITY Establish IT that enables business strategy immediately and tomorrow * Must map, define, and standardize technology, data, and business processes to make that possible * Must watch both macro and Micro view.Macro Understand the business strategy and translate this into an architectural approachMicro susceptibility to work with individual projects and deliver very concrete guidance to these projects that focus on the successful address of the individual project within that macro view * Must know how to bridge silos* Transforms tech-speak into the language of business solutions * Knows what technology is needed to enable business strategy * Acts like a city planner get out Road maps, zoning, common requirements, regulations, and strategy, only that he does this in a company. * Desires to serve what is best for the enterprise vs. the individual department or project Andy Croft, Campbell Soup Companys VP of IT shared services. * Holistic Approach sounding at the bigger perspective take a step back and try to project what riddle the proposed project will solve.Is there already a solution that covers the proposed area being researched?Does the proposed project depart into the wider picture?* Ensures that the pie ces of the wider-picture puzzle fit together Heinckiens * Should create compliance standards* Should provide the necessary data that are useful and relevant to everyone in the company. (blueprint) Who owns the data?Who should receive permission to access the data?* Must be a voice that many kinds of people idler understand Tim Ferrarell, CIO and senior VP of enterprise systems at W.W. Grainger. * Should think at a strategic level and all the way down to the operating level * Should understand how to move and down that chain of abstraction * Know how to deal with conflicts and trade-offs* Has to gain the confidence of the senior leadership team. * Vision Must understand how the company works, where it wants to go, and how technology helps or hinders. So that effective working relationships female genitals bloom.Should have business and technical knowledge.* Enterprise architects continuously reinforce to business-side counterparts the expected returns on IT projects as the ent icement to cut spending grows. * computer architecture plan to ensure that IT provides a competitive advantage2. Consider the diverse companies mentioned in the case and their experiences with enterprise architecture. Does this approach seem to work better in certain types of companies or industries than in others? Why or why not?Experiences of the four respective companies mentioned have worked successfully in their enterprises. It is submitted, however, that the difference of business nature and other factors attendant to specific line of business, while admitting that every enterprise indisputably needs to adopt current technology and may need enterprise architect, the degree of success win thereof varies. The peculiarity of a certain business enterprise may require less the familiarity of enterprise architect.The old adage that the only permanent thing in this world is change rightfully applies to every enterprise. This being so, one business strategy may be copied wholly or partly with varying degree of success and sometimes even dismal failure. This also means that for a percentage point of time this enterprise architectural approach may work but not for a life sentence as is approach or strategy may be outmoded or rendered obsolete with the orgasm of new environment and technology, among others.3. What is the value derived from companies with mature enterprise architectures? Can you see any disadvantages?When the state of fledged enterprise architectures is reached, it is also expected that the maximum benefits in terms of business profit margins, stability of the enterprise, magnification of business and formation of new enterprises, and even the production of new products and services are also succeed with maximum efficiency and productivity. However, note must be taken of the fact that once maturity is deliver the goods there are accompanying disadvantages such as the deceleration of upward movement and may have even reached its peak.Once one is at its peak, the apt(predicate) thing to happen is for to slide down. Maturity in any undertaking has also its corresponding negative aspect. Such as the lukewarm attitude towards spill into new discoveries and therefore allow itself to be drowned into the depth of obsolescence. Or the belief that since these enterprises with matured architectures that they are at the top, they tend to rest on their laurels and think that nobody could outsmart them in terms of determination new and innovative ways to improve the lot of enterprises. When they are in on this stage, they are likely to suffer an imminent loss.REAL WORLD ACTIVITIES1. Service-oriented architecture (SOA) is a recent approach to systems development and effectuation that has much in common (and some differences, as well) with enterprise architecture. Go online and research the quasi(prenominal)ities and differences. Prepare a report to summarize your work.Service-oriented architecture is a client/server software design approach in which an application consists of software services and software service consumers (also known as clients or service requesters). SOA differs from the to a greater extent(prenominal) general client/server model in its definitive emphasis on loose couple between software components, and in its use of separately standing interfaces.both aim to address issues on the enterprise level (strategy and planning, reference architecture, and so on), and at the same time their governance models are similar. An enterprise thats adopting SOA while developing EA and its governances may encounter problems if the similarities and overlaps between EA and SOA are not recognized and accounted for.Architecture domains similarities and differencesThe following summarizes the similarities and differences when considering the concepts of architecture in both SOA and EASimilaritiesSOA and EA domains share many similarities. For example* Both address similar architectural domains.* Both are intended to closely align IT with business.* Both use input establish on business objectives.* Both require similar strategies and planning activities.DifferencesWhile the focus of the EA architecture domains is on the macro level, the SOA architecture domains work on a micro level. More specifically * EA focuses on delineate business components, while SOA focuses on business services. * EA deals with application frameworks and enterprise applications, while SOAs scope is on service modeling only. * EA deals with enterprise-level infrastructure including servers, databases, and so on, while SOA focuses on the infrastructure that supports services, namely the Enterprise Service Bus. * EA addresses enterprise integration patterns and when they should be used, including point-to-point integrationfile transfer, and other traditional application integration approaches authorization ProblemsBecause of the overlap in the architecture domains of both EA and SOA, the following potential problems may arise when the two are developed in isolation * If the enterprise focuses only on SOA, its possible that other EA aspects are ignored. For example, legitimate needs for integration approaches and standards other than those supported by SOA (for example, point-to-point interface) may be ignored and not addressed on the enterprise level. Also, without EA organizations may fall into applying the Golden Hammer antipattern (if a hammer is your only tool, then every problem looks like a nail) and attempt to use SOA for every solution, even the ones that dont benefit from such architecture. * With parallel efforts to develop an SOA and EA concurrently, you might encounter inefficiencies as a result of duplicate efforts and missed opportunities to leverage existing architecture artifacts. Its conceivable that two teams working on developing SOA and EA can spend unnecessary time and resources producing duplicate, and sometimes contradicting. Information models, infrastructure, system-management policies, strategies, and tools.2. Have you considered a course as an enterprise architect? What bundle of courses would you put together to design a major or a track in enterprise architecture? Break into small groups with your classmates to outline the major areas that should be covered. (No need to break into small groups just outline the major areas that should be covered)To become an enterprise architect, it requires more than having a degree in engineering, architecture, IT, and business. It demands years of hands-on experience. As a graduate of Entrepreneurial Marketing I can say that I have the knowledge on how to manage a business in what ways will the business be more profitable and by what means it can sustain in this competitive economy. Nonetheless, theories are not enough for the industry to survive. To qualify as an enterprise architect I must work for at least 8 10 years in an industry to be equipped with the right knowledge, skills, and experienc e on how the whole system works.The courses which may be bundled are* Engineering Courses* Mechanical* Electrical* Civil* Industrial & Systems Engr (ISyE)* Business and Management Courses* Marketing* economics* Accounting* Business Management* Investment & Financial Risk Management* Architectural Studies (Undergrad and Graduate Studies)* shew/Master of Business Administration* MArch/Master of Computer lore* MArch/Master of Science in Civil and Engineering* Environmental Engineering (Construction Engineering and Management or Structures) * IT Courses* Master mark Courses* Preferably MBA* Architectural Studies (cited above)* Trainings and Seminars on* Six Sigma* Business Process* Process Improvement (Innovation and Continuous Improvement) * Cross-functional police squad* IT Management and Strategy* Marketing and Product Management* Quality and Business Planning* Enterprise packet* Enterprise Architecture* Security* Cloud Computing* Vendor Management* Consulting* Business Intell igence* organisation* Software Project* OutsourcingThe courses which may be bundled are Business Courses Marketing, Accounting, IT with Industrial Psychology Engineering (Mech., Automotive, Electl., Civil, Electronics, Computer) and technology courses may also be bundled with IT and Industrial Psychology. Then Sociology, Community Development, Political Science, AB English, Psychology with IT.